Falkowski v. Imation Corporation

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 1868·320 F.3d 905·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1438·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2874
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 200301-16113California293 words

Opinion

Opinion

320 F.3d 905 Mark W. FALKOWSKI; Michael Benz; Jean-Luc Chatelain; Phillippe C. Ciampossin; Craig W. Cornelius, Ph. D.; Gregg W. Cretella; John H. Davis; John D. Edwards; Anthony J. Fillicelli; Grady Floyd; Ingemar Gustafson; Arturo Gamboa; Srividya Krishnamachary; Matthew Long; Russell W. Loop, Sr.; Gregory J. Masek; Sanjay Mehta; Douglas A. Merk; Karl E. Minser; Linda J. Moore; Antruong Nguyen; Bang Nguyen; Dennis O'Dell; Gregory L. Orr; Tuan Pham; Eli Rapaich; Jonathan Reis; Brian K. Rice; Eric Rodriguez; Ken H. Rosenfeld; Jeremy Rubin, M.D.; Jan Schieberl; Rick Shroyer; Charles H. Smith; John Hampton Smith; Martha Torres; Dennis Totah; Vu Hao Truong; Sharon Woolsey, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. IMATION CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; William T. Monahan; Bradley T. Sauer; Jill D. Burchill, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-16113. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted August 14, 2002. Filed October 29, 2002. Amended February 18, 2003. Neal A. Dublinsky, Lionel Z. Glancy, Law Offices of Lionel Z. Glancy, Los Angeles, CA, for the appellants. James K. Langdon II, Andrew Holly, Dorsey & Whitney…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.