Derrick Lesean Lewis v. Gail Lewis, Deputy Warden

Good Law
321 F.3d 824·2003 WL 554748·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1720·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3669
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 200301-56927California4,718 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nelson, J.

Derrick Lesean Lewis appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . During jury selection before his state court trial for murder, Lewis alleged that race motivated the prosecutor’s peremptory strike of an African American member of the jury venire in violation of his constitutional rights as articulated in Batson v. Kentucky, The state trial court rejected Lewis’s Batson motion, and the state appellate court affirmed. We conclude that the California Court of Appeal unreasonably applied law clearly established by the Supreme Court. Therefore, we reverse with instructions to grant the writ.

I.

The State of California charged Lewis with murder in connection with a gang-related killing in Santa Barbara. A twelve-member jury convicted Lewis, and he is currently serving a sentence of nineteen years to life. The jury selection process' — in particular, the prosecutor’s use of a peremptory strike to remove one of two African-Americans in the jury pool during the selection of alternate jurors — is at issue in this case. Lewis claims that the trial court improperly rejected his challenge of the prosecutor’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.