Seinfeld v. Bartz

Good Law
322 F.3d 693·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2076·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 4026
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 200302-15498California3,040 words

Opinion

Opinion

322 F.3d 693 Greg SEINFELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carol BARTZ; John T. Chambers; Mary Cirillo; James F. Gibbons; Edward Kozel; James C. Morgan, Jaohn P. Morgridge; Donald Valentine; Steven M. West; Cisco Systems, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-15498. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 5, 2002. Filed March 7, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED A. Arnold Gershon, New York, NY, for the plaintiff-appellant. Kevin P. Muck, Clifford Chance Rogers & Wells, San Francisco, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Thelton E. Henderson, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV 01-2259 TEH. Before: BRUNETTI and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge. * TASHIMA, Circuit Judge: 1 Plaintiff-Appellant Greg Seinfeld appeals an order of the district court dismissing his action for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Seinfeld, a shareholder of Cisco Systems, Inc., filed a derivative action against Appellees, the company and its board of directors. In his complaint, Seinfeld alleged that Appellees violated § 14(a) of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.