In Re Thomas James Dyer, Debtor. Nancy Knupfer, Trustee v. John Lindblade, in Re Thomas James Dyer, Debtor, John Lindblade v. Nancy Knupfer, Trustee

Good Law
322 F.3d 1178·2003 WL 1090176·41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 64·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2268·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 4440
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 13, 200301-56319, 01-56384California9,403 words

Opinion

Opinion

Berzon, J.

This case presents an important bankruptcy law question of first impression in this circuit: Does the sanction authority granted to bankruptcy courts under 11 U.S.C. § 105 (a) permit punitive sanctions? Before reaching that question, we address several other issues arising from the bankruptcy proceedings of Thomas Dyer (“Dyer”), the ex-husband of Jeanie Lind-blade (“Jeanie”).

Dyer and Jeanie owned a house together when they were married (“the home”). Jeanie’s father, John Lindblade (“Mr. Lindblade”), claims to hold a lien on the home. Mr. Lindblade maintains that he lent funds to the couple to enable them to buy the home and secured the debt by a deed of trust executed in 1992. The deed of trust, however, was not recorded until May 11, 1998, several weeks after Dyer filed for bankruptcy, listing the home as one of his assets.

The bankruptcy court determined that the deed of trust was unenforceable because the underlying debt secured was nonexistent. The funds Mr. Lindblade advanced, held the bankruptcy court, were not a loan at all, but instead were a gift to Dyer and his then-wife Jeanie. We conclude that this finding of the bankruptcy court is clearly erroneous, so we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.