Frederick Kaplan v. City of North Las Vegas Thomas H. Stephens

Good Law
323 F.3d 1226·2003 WL 1701900·14 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 295·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2804·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 6221
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 200302-16048California3,202 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

Plaintiff-Appellant Frederick Kaplan was a peace officer employed by the Defendant-Appellee City of North Las Vegas (City). After being injured in a training exercise, Kaplan could not hold a gun or grasp objects with his right hand. When Kaplan’s pain continued after therapy sessions, Kaplan’s slow recovery was attributed to rheumatoid arthritis, a conclusion later determined to be a misdiagnosis. Based on this misdiagnosis, the City believed Kaplan’s injury was permanent. The City fired Kaplan.

Kaplan filed suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 , against the City. The complaint alleged that the City discriminated against Kaplan by terminating him from his peace officer position because of a disability, rheumatoid arthritis. The United States District Court for the District of Nevada granted the City’s motion for summary judgment after concluding that Kaplan could not show that he is a “qualified individual with a disability” within the meaning of the ADA. On this appeal we consider (1) whether Kaplan could perform the essential functions of a peace officer position without an accommodation and (2) whether Kaplan was entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.