Freund v. Nycomed Amersham

Good Law
326 F.3d 1070·19 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1601·56 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 76·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3313·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 7537
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 22, 200301-56491California9,467 words

Opinion

Opinion

326 F.3d 1070 Jeffrey R. FREUND, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. NYCOMED AMERSHAM, a business entity, form unknown; Amersham Holdings, Inc.; Nycomed Amersham Imaging, a division of Nycomed Amersham; Amersham/ Medi-Physics, Inc., a division of Nycomed Amersham, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. No. 01-56491. No. 01-56494. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 5, 2002. Filed April 22, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Thomas M. Peterson, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the defendants-appellants-cross-appellees. John S. Adler, San Diego, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-02202-IEG(LSP). Before CANBY, GOULD, and BERZON, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge CANBY. Opinion dissenting in part by Judge GOULD. OPINION CANBY, Circuit Judge. 1 A jury in district court found that defendant Nycomed Amersham 1 had wrongfully terminated the employment of plaintiff Jeffrey R. Freund for making bona-fide safety complaints, thereby committing the California state-law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.