Silveira v. Lockyer

Good Law
328 F.3d 567·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8564
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 200301-15098California12,740 words

Opinion

Opinion

328 F.3d 567 Sean SILVEIRA; Jack Safford; Patrick Overstreet; David K. Mehl; Steven Focht, Sgt.; David Blalock, Sgt.; Marcus Davis; Vance Boyce; Keneth Dewald, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bill LOCKYER, Attorney General, State of California; Gray Davis, Governor, State of California, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-15098. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Filed May 6, 2003. Gary W. Gorski, Fair Oaks, CA, Daniel M. Karalash, Robert Lucas, Richards, Karalash, Lucas & Lacy, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Nancy L. Palmieri, San Diego, CA, Tim L. Rieger, Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, David F. De Alba, Attorney General's Office of the State of California, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellee. C.D. Michel, Trutanich & Michel LLP, San Pedro, CA, for Amicus. Before: REINHARDT, MAGILL, * and FISHER, Circuit Judges. 1 Order; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent by Judge KLEINFELD; Dissent by Judge GOULD. ORDER 2 A majority of the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. 3 The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.