Krug v. Lutz

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 5131·329 F.3d 692·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 9200
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 200301-16033California4,053 words

Opinion

Opinion

329 F.3d 692 Lawrence J. KRUG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas LUTZ, Dr.; Mecoli, Dr.; Fischer, NP; Cleeney, FHA; Flannigan, Warden; D.W. Cattel, Deputy Warden; Mike Dunn, Deputy Warden; Yolanda Martinez, Deputy Warden; Gonzales, Warden; Spargur; Monica Taylor, Defendants-Appellants, and Felix F. Jabczenski, Jr., Dr., Defendant. No. 01-16033. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 11, 2002. Filed May 14, 2003. Wanda E. Hofmann and Bruce L. Skolnik, Assistant Attorneys General, Tucson, AZ, for the defendants-appellants. Adam N. Steinman and Julia Parsons Clarke, Perkins Coie LLP, Seattle, WA, for the plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Raner C. Collins, District Judge. Presiding, D.C. No. CV-99-00362-RCC. Before BROWNING, FISHER, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. OPINION FISHER, Circuit Judge. 1 Lawrence Krug is an Arizona state prisoner. He claims that Appellants, various Arizona Department of Corrections officials ("ADOC officials"), violated his procedural due process rights by failing to give him the opportunity to appeal the exclusion of incoming publications to a prison official other than…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.