Metronet Services Corporation Metronet Telemanagement Corporation v. Us West Communications

Bad Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 5439·329 F.3d 986·2003 WL 21181644·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4245·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 9796
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 200301-35406California13,807 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING JOINT PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny appellees’ joint petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc, filed April 21, 2003.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The opinion filed March 31, 2003, is amended as follows:

At slip op. 4495, line 9, replace the sentence beginning “It is undisputed” with the following:

At slip op. 4503, line 3, italicize “any.”

At slip op. 4503, line 5, replace the phrase “but the second is erroneous.” with “; the second overstates MetroNet’s burden.”

At slip op. 4503, line 8, insert the phrase “due to per location pricing” between the words “profitability” and “was”.

At slip op. 4503, line 13, replace the sentence beginning “As to the second requirement” and the accompanying citation with the following:

At slip op. 4503, line 18, insert the phrase “and other resellers” after “driving it”.

At slip op. 4503, line 32, add the following sentence after “this evidence of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.