Adam Pelich v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Adele J. Fasano, District Director, for the San Diego District

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 5513·329 F.3d 1057·2003 WL 21204158·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4286·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10245
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 22, 200301-56796California2,567 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rawlinson, J.

We are aware of the proscription against indefinite detention articulated in Zadvy-das v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 , 121 S.Ct. 2491 , 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001). However, Petitioner’s detention in this case is indefinite only because he refuses to cooperate with the Immigration and Naturalization Service’s (“INS”) efforts to remove him. In such a circumstance, Petitioner has no cause to complain; we thus AFFIRM the district court’s denial of Appellant’s habeas petition.

I.

BACKGROUND

Adam Pelich (“Pelich”) was born on January 3, 1957, in Brzeg, Poland. In September 1981, he fled Poland to a refugee camp in Austria. Shortly thereafter, he applied for refugee status in the United States. In that application, he identified himself as a Polish national. The application was approved on March 25, 1982, and Pelich entered the United States as a refugee on April 15,1982.

On May 12, 1983, Pelich submitted his application for lawful permanent resident status, stating that he was a German national. Pelich also averred that his father was born in Germany, and that he did not know his mother’s place of birth. His application reflected his mother’s residence as Brzeg, Poland, and that his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.