Melvin T. Yamamoto Elaine S. Yamamoto Maxine H. Tampon v. Bank of New York Bnc Mortgage U.S. Financial Corporation

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 5722·329 F.3d 1167·2003 WL 21231904·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4481·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10665
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 29, 200301-16427California2,961 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rymer, J.

This appeal requires us to decide whether a court may order borrowers who seek recission of a mortgage under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. § 1635 , to show that proceeds can be tendered if they prevail. Here, the borrowers testified that they could not fulfill TILA’s tender requirement, and the district court gave them sixty days before dismissing their recission claim to attempt to do so. When they were unable to provide evidence that they could tender the proceeds, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the lender. We hold that a district court has discretion to modify the sequence of rescission events in these circumstances, and affirm.

I

On January 23, 1997, Melvin and Elaine Yamamoto, through their mortgage broker U.S. Financial Mortgage Corp. (USF), borrowed $172,500 from BNC Mortgage, Inc. (BNC) to refinance an existing mortgage on their home. The loan was cosigned by their daughter, Maxine Tampon. On February 3, 1997, BNC assigned the Yamamoto/Tampon mortgage to the Bank of New York (BNY).

After making eight payments (totaling approximately $12,000), the Yamamotos and Tampon defaulted. In March 1998, the Yamamotos filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.