Virginia Dumlao Taniguchi v. John Paul Schultz Kathleen Hawy Sawyer Doris Meissner John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Virginia Agustin Taniguchi v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 6623·332 F.3d 1205·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5226·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12028
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 200300-16928California1,895 words

Opinion

Opinion

332 F.3d 1205 Virginia Dumlao TANIGUCHI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John Paul SCHULTZ; Kathleen Hawy Sawyer; Doris Meissner; John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. Virginia Agustin Taniguchi, Petitioner, v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 00-16928. No. 00-71053. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Filed June 18, 2003. Virginia Dumlao Taniguchi, Marysville, CA, pro se. Jocelyn Burton, Robert Yeargin, USSF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Linda S. Wernery, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., for Respondent-Appellee. Before RONEY, * HUG, THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Order; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON. ORDER PER CURIAM. 1 The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Thomas has voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc and Judges Roney and Hug have so recommended. 2 The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35. 3 The petition for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.