Honolulu Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee of United Association Local Union No. 675 Training Association of United Association Local Union No. 675 v. James H. Foster, Iii, Honolulu Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee of United Association Local Union No. 675 Training Association of United Association Local Union No. 675 v. James H. Foster, III

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 6702·332 F.3d 1234·30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2031·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5253·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12293
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 19, 200301-16596California2,773 words

Opinion

Opinion

332 F.3d 1234 HONOLULU JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING COMMITTEE OF UNITED ASSOCIATION LOCAL UNION NO. 675; Training Association of United Association Local Union No. 675, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James H. FOSTER, III, Defendant-Appellee. Honolulu Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee of United Association Local Union No. 675; Training Association of United Association Local Union No. 675, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. James H. Foster, III, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-16596. No. 01-16641. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 6, 2002. Filed June 19, 2003. Michael L. Freed, Michael L. Freed & Associates, Honolulu, HI, for the defendant-appellee-cross-appellant. Fred I. Waki, Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing, Honolulu, HI, for the plaintiff-appellant-cross-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii; Barry M. Kurren, Magistrate Judge, Presiding, D.C. No. CV-00-00496-BMK. Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, ALARCÓN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. 1 This appeal arises from a union's action to recover the costs of training James H. Foster, III as an apprentice in the plumbing and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.