United States v. Antonio Rivera-Relle

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 6625·333 F.3d 914·2003 WL 21397733·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5227·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12032
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 18, 200302-50211California3,677 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hall, J.

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The opinion filed March 6, 2003 ( 322 F.3d 670 ), is hereby amended as follows:

Footnote 9, insert the following two new paragraphs after the first paragraph:

With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny appellant’s petition for panel rehearing. Judge Berzon has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judges Hall and Thompson have recommended denial. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. RApp. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.

The clerk shall accept no further filings in this case.

OPINION

Antonio Rivera-Relie, a previously deported alien, appeals his conviction for attempting to enter the United States with out the consent of the Attorney General in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Rivera assigns two errors to his conviction. First, he contends that to be guilty of the crime of attempting to enter the United States, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he never, in fact, succeeded in entering the United States. Since the jury was not so…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.