Jose Luis Perdomo-Padilla v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 6898·333 F.3d 964·2003 WL 21435851·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5417·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12633
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 200301-71454California3,850 words

Opinion

Opinion

Graber, J.

Petitioner Jose Luis Perdomo Padilla, a citizen of Mexico, was convicted of conspiracy to distribute marijuana. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) instituted removal proceedings against him pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(A)(iii), which provides for the removal of an alien who has been convicted of an aggravated felony. Arguing that he is a “national of the United States” within the meaning of 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(22) because he completed an application for naturalization containing a statement of allegiance to the United States, Petitioner appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision ordering his removal. We hold that the filing of an application for naturalization does not change an applicant’s immigration status from that of an alien to that of a national because, under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), a person may become a “national of the United States” only through birth or naturalization. Accordingly, we deny the petition.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Petitioner, a Mexican citizen, entered the United States through the Port of Entry in San Ysidro, California, and became a legal permanent resident of the United States in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.