Alford v. Haner

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 6902·333 F.3d 972·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5407·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12631
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 200301-35141California4,859 words

Opinion

Opinion

333 F.3d 972 Jerome Anthony ALFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joi HANER, a Washington State Patrol Officer; Jane Doe Haner, his wife; Gerald Devenpeck, Sgt., Washington State Patrol; Jane Doe Devenpeck, his wife, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-35141. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 14, 2002. Filed June 23, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED R. Stuart Phillips, Poulsbo, WA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Christine O. Gregoire, Attorney General, Eric A. Mentzer, Assistant Attorney General, Olympia, WA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-05586-RJB. Before BROWNING, B. FLETCHER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge BROWNING; Dissent by Judge GOULD. OPINION BROWNING, Circuit Judge: 1 Tony Alford spent the night in jail for tape recording a traffic stop. Since taping police officers during the performance of their public duties is not illegal under the Washington Privacy Act, the charge was dismissed by a state court. 2 Alford then filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that his arrest, incarceration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.