Busquets-Ivars v. Ashcroft

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 6924·333 F.3d 1008·62 Fed. R. Serv. 717·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5473·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12739
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 200302-70643California1,707 words

Opinion

Opinion

333 F.3d 1008 Pedro Sebastian BUSQUETS-IVARS; Angelica Sylvia Busquets; Alejandro Ernesto Busquets-Araneda; Mauricio Ignacio Busquets-Araneda, Petitioners, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 02-70643. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 9, 2003. Filed June 24, 2003. Gregory J. Boult, and Roger J. Gleckman, Gleckman and Sinder, Los Angeles, CA, for the petitioners. Jamie M. Dowd and Russell J.E. Verby, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, DC, for the respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge BEEZER; Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ. OPINION BEEZER, Circuit Judge: 1 We consider the requirements for proper notice of scheduled removal hearings. 2 Pedro Sebastian Busquets-Ivars, Angelica Sylvia Busquets, Alejandro Ernesto Busquets-Araneda and Mauricio Ignacio Busquets-Araneda ("Busquets") were ordered removed in absentia. The Busquets contend that the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS") failed to prove service of notice. The Busquets petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals'…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.