United States v. Carlos Moreno-Morillo, AKA Carlos Moreno-Moreo, United States of America v. Alberto Gonzalez-Rivas, United States of America v. Jose Sabino-Caicedo, United States of America v. Bernardo Pandeles-Valencia

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 6980·334 F.3d 819·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5515·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12836
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 200301-50293California5,514 words

Opinion

Opinion

334 F.3d 819 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos MORENO-MORILLO, aka Carlos Moreno-Moreo, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto Gonzalez-Rivas, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Sabino-Caicedo, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bernardo Pandeles-Valencia, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-50293. No. 01-50305. No. 01-50310. No. 01-50477. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 10, 2002. Filed June 25, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Mark S. Windsor and Janice M. Deaton, San Diego, CA, argued the case for the appellants and filed briefs. Kay Sunday, Eugene G. Iredale, and Benjamin Sanchez also were on the briefs. Patrick K. O'Toole, United States Attorney (when brief was filed), Carol C. Lam, United States Attorney (when opinion was filed), Karen E. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, CA, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Judith N. Keep, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-00-02636-K-04. Before: HUG, BRUNETTI, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.