Erwin Estuardo Garcia-Lopez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General

Caution
2003 Daily Journal DAR 7065·334 F.3d 840·2003 WL 21468252·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5596·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12928
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 200302-70200California2,663 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ferguson, J.

Erwin Estuardo Garcia-Lopez petitions from a final order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Garcia-Lopez contends that the BIA erred when it determined that he was ineligible for suspension of deportation under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)’s “petty offense” exception. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(2)(A)(ii)(II) (1996). Specifically, Garcia-Lopez asserts that his guilty plea conviction pursuant to a California “wobbler” statute, under which the offense may be treated as either a misdemeanor or a felony, did not result in a conviction of a crime for which the maximum penalty exceeds imprisonment for one year. Because we determine that the state court’s declaration that Garcia-Lopez’s offense was a misdemeanor is binding on Garcia-Lopez’s subsequent immigration proceedings, we reverse.

I.

Garcia-Lopez is a native and citizen of Guatemala. When he was a child, his biological mother died as a result of being beaten by his stepfather. Thereafter, Garcia-Lopez was raised by his aunt, Erma Lopez, whom he now looks upon as his mother. In 1983, Ms. Lopez came to the United States. In 1985, Garcia-Lopez and his cousin David, Ms. Lopez’s son, came to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.