Ramirez v. Galaza

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 7144·334 F.3d 850·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5662·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13034
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 27, 200319-35185California5,774 words

Opinion

Opinion

334 F.3d 850 Luis RAMIREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George M. GALAZA, Warden; James Gomez, Director of CDC; R. McEnroe, Lieutenant; O. Pena, Chief Deputy Warden; Adrian Chacon, Medical Assistant; Garth Embree, Physician; J. Batchelor, Examiner; Linda L. Melching, Chief Inmate Appeals Branch, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-15994. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 6, 2002. Filed June 27, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Peter Huang, McDermott, Will & Emery, Palo Alto, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Thomas S. Patterson, Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Robert E. Coyle, Chief Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-06282-REC/DLB. Before COWEN, * HAWKINS and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges. OPINION COWEN, Circuit Judge: 1 California state prisoner Luis Ramirez brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of the Due Process and Equal Protection guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment. Ramirez's complaint alleged that his constitutional rights were violated by the procedures utilized in a prison…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.