Javier Noriega-Lopez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Charles Demore Lori Scialabba

Bad Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 7546·335 F.3d 874·2003 WL 21540411·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5989·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13721
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 200301-17525California4,515 words

Opinion

Opinion

Berzon, J.

Javier Noriega-Lopez is a citizen and national of Mexico admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident alien about thirty-six years ago. In March 2000, Noriega-Lopez was convicted of felony possession of heroin for sale in violation of California Health and Safety Code § 11351, an offense classified as an aggravated felony and a controlled substance offense under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii); (B)(i). Shortly thereafter, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) issued a Notice to Appear charging Noriega-Lopez with removability for his crime. Noriega-Lopez denied that he had been convicted as stated in the Notice to Appear. At a removal hearing on July 17, 2000, the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) reviewed the INS’s proffer of documentation and concluded that the agency’s showing was inadequate to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Noriega-Lopez had been so convicted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(3)(A) (“the Service has the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that, in the case of an alien who has been admitted to the United States, the alien is deportable”). The IJ focused on the fact that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.