Jerome B. Vernazza v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Ims/cpas & Associates Vernon T. Hall Stanley E. Hargrave v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 7965·335 F.3d 1096·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14382
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 17, 20033-9042California223 words

Opinion

Opinion

335 F.3d 1096 Jerome B. VERNAZZA, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent. IMS/CPAS & Associates; Vernon T. Hall; Stanley E. Hargrave, Petitioners, v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Respondent. No. 01-71857. No. 02-70016. No. 3-9042. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 5, 2003. Filed April 24, 2003. Amended July 17, 2003. Sheldon M. Jaffe, Los Angeles, CA, for petitioner Jerome B. Vernazza. Thomas D. Giachetti, Princeton, NJ, and Ashleigh C. Swayze, Stark & Stark, PC, Lawrenceville, NJ, for petitioners IMS/CPAs & Associates, Vernon T. Hall, and Stanley E. Hargrave. Eric Summergrad, Deputy Solicitor, and Mark Pennington, Assistant General Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, for the respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Securities & Exchange Commission. Before D.W. NELSON, WARDLAW and FISHER, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The respondent's motion to amend the opinion is DENIED. The opinion filed April 24, 2003, is amended as follows: 2 Slip op. at 5318, line 13: Replace the phrase "Although the Commission's determination of the duty of care" with "Although the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.