In Re Fred Lawrence Silberkraus, Debtor, Debtor, Thomas W. Dressler Dressler Rein Evans & Sestanovich Llp, Now Known as Rein Evans & Sestanovich LLP v. The Seeley Company, in Re Fred Lawrence Silberkraus, Debtor, Debtor, Thomas W. Dressler Dressler Rein Evans & Sestanovich Llp, Now Known as Rein Evans & Sestanovich LLP v. L.E. Coppersmith Inc.

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 7612·336 F.3d 864·41 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 144·50 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 810·55 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1291
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 200301-56992California3,004 words

Opinion

Opinion

336 F.3d 864 In re Fred Lawrence SILBERKRAUS, Debtor, Debtor, Thomas W. Dressler; Dressler Rein Evans & Sestanovich LLP, now known as Rein Evans & Sestanovich LLP, Appellants, v. The Seeley Company, Appellee. In re Fred Lawrence Silberkraus, Debtor, Debtor, Thomas W. Dressler; Dressler Rein Evans & Sestanovich Llp, now known as Rein Evans & Sestanovich LLP, Appellants, v. L.E. Coppersmith Inc., Appellee. No. 01-56992. No. 01-56994. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 4, 2002. Filed July 10, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Thomas W. Dressler, Dressler & La Vina LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued the cause for the appellants. Dennis McPhillips was on the briefs. Joseph A. Eisenberg, Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued the cause for the appellees. Michael I. Gottfried and Thomas M. Geher, Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP, and Abraham M. Rudy and Julie B. Waldman, Weissmann, Wolff, Bergman, Coleman, Silverman & Holmes LLP, Beverly Hills, California, were on the briefs. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Carlos R. Moreno, District Judge,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.