Selkirk Conservation Alliance v. Forsgren

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 7955·336 F.3d 944·33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20242·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6301·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14353
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 17, 200302-35635California10,014 words

Opinion

Opinion

336 F.3d 944 SELKIRK CONSERVATION ALLIANCE, a non-profit public interest group; Sierra Club, a non-profit public interest group; Kettle Range Conservation Group, a non-profit public interest group; Idaho Conservation League, a non-profit public interest group; Pend Oreille Environmental Team, a non-profit public interest group, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Harv FORSGREN, in his official capacity as Regional Forester of the Pacific Northwest Region; Dale Bosworth, in his official capacity as Chief of the U.S. Forest Service; Susan Martin, in her official capacity as Supervisor of the Upper Columbia Office of U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service; Steve Williams, in his official capacity as Director of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Defendants-Appellees, Stimson Lumber Company, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. No. 02-35635. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 9, 2002. Filed July 17, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Douglas L. Honnold and Timothy J. Preso, Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund, Bozeman, MT, for plaintiffs-appellants Selkirk Conservation Alliance, et al. Stephanie Tai, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.