United States v. Jose Augustin Romero-Bustamente

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 8541·337 F.3d 1104·2003 WL 21757130·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6765·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15249
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 200302-10414California2,697 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nelson, J.

Appellant José Agustín Romero-Busta-mente (“Romero”) challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress the discovery of two undocumented Mexican nationals in his backyard in the border town of Nogales, Arizona. Following the denial of the motion to suppress, Romero pled guilty to one count of harboring illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(1)(A)(iii) and (B)(i), subject to the condition that he retain his right to appeal the suppression motion. Finding that the motion to suppress should have been granted, we vacate the judgment of conviction and remand with directions to dismiss the indictment.

Factual And Procedural B Ackground

The facts are largely undisputed. Romero lives in a house at 10 Escalada Street in Nogales, Arizona; the property is approximately 10-15 feet north of the border with Mexico. The property is surrounded by, in parts, a brick wall and, in other parts, a wire link fence. There is a space in front of the house, facing the street, and an enclosed backyard behind the house. At the back of the backyard is a shed, and there is a space of about two and half feet between the shed and the fence. The distance from the back door…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.