Valley Outdoor, Inc. v. County Of Riverside

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 8539·337 F.3d 1111·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6767·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15250
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 200302-55475California2,001 words

Opinion

Opinion

337 F.3d 1111 VALLEY OUTDOOR, INC., a California Corporation; Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc., a California Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision of the State of California, Defendant-Appellee. No. 02-55475. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 5, 2003. Filed July 31, 2003. Paul E. Fisher, Fisher & Associates, P.C., Newport Beach, CA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Madison S. Spach, Jr., Newport Beach, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Randal R. Morrison, Sabine and Morrison, San Diego, CA, for the defendant-appellee. Glenn Beloian, Office of Riverside County Counsel, Riverside, CA, for the defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Ronald S.W. Lew, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-00498-RSWL. Before BROWNING, B. FLETCHER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges. OPINION BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge. 1 Plaintiffs-Appellants Valley Outdoor ("Valley") and Regency Outdoor Advertising ("Regency"), two billboard companies, challenge the constitutionality of two different versions of Defendant-Appellee Riverside County's sign…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.