United States v. Esly Pereira-Salmeron

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 8702·337 F.3d 1148·2003 WL 21782521·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6906·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15519
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 4, 200302-10071California3,299 words

Opinion

Opinion

Clifton, J.

This case presents the question of whether a prior felony conviction under Virginia Code § 18.2-63, for carnal knowledge of a child between 13 and 15 years of age, constitutes a conviction for a “crime of violence” under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines provision governing sentences for unlawful re-entry into the United States, U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 (2002). Under the November 2001 amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines, a defendant convicted of unlawful re-entry may be subject to a greater sentence if he had previously been deported following a felony convietion. The level of sentence enhancement varies according to the nature of the defendant’s prior crime. The district court in this case held that Pereira-Salmeron’s 1999 conviction for “carnal knowledge of a child” constituted an “aggravated felony” under the Sentencing Guidelines, for which an 8-level enhancement was appropriate, but was not a “crime of violence,” for which a 16-level enhancement would have applied. We disagree, and conclude that Pereira-Salmeron’s prior Virginia conviction did involve a “crime of violence,” warranting a 16-level sentencing enhancement. We therefore vacate the district court’s sentence and remand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.