United States v. Boyd P. Braren Boyd P. Braren Trust Marilyn J. Mosby John M. Mosby Leslie Hufford Kenneth J. Hufford Hart Estate Investment Company Peggy Marenco, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor v. Klamath Indian Tribes, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee. United States of America v. Boyd P. Braren Boyd P. Braren Trust Marilyn J. Mosby John M. Mosby Leslie Hufford Kenneth J. Hufford Hart Estate Investment Company Peggy Marenco, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant v. Klamath Indian Tribes, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee
Opinion
Opinion
338 F.3d 971 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Boyd P. BRAREN; Boyd P. Braren Trust; Marilyn J. Mosby; John M. Mosby; Leslie Hufford; Kenneth J. Hufford; Hart Estate Investment Company; Peggy Marenco, Defendants-Appellants, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor, v. Klamath Indian Tribes, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Boyd P. Braren; Boyd P. Braren Trust; Marilyn J. Mosby; John M. Mosby; Leslie Hufford; Kenneth J. Hufford; Hart Estate Investment Company; Peggy Marenco, Defendants, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant, v. Klamath Indian Tribes, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee. No. 02-35441. No. 02-35446. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 8, 2003 — Portland, Oregon. Filed July 21, 2003. William F. Schroeder and Carol DeHaven Skerjanec, Vale, Oregon, and Jerome C. Muys, Washington, D.C., for appellants Brarens. Stephanie L. Striffler, Special Counsel to the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, Oregon, for appellant Oregon. Andrew C. Mergen, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee United States. Walter R. Echo-Hawk, Native American Rights…