Broudo v. Dura Pharmaceuticals

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 8748·339 F.3d 933·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6976·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 15621
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 200301-57136California4,085 words

Opinion

Opinion

339 F.3d 933 Michael BROUDO; Baldev S. Gill; Larry Morgan Ira; Leonid Shvartsman, (for G & S partnership); Neil Siskind; Roberta Speck; Brent Vogt, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; Cam L. Garner; James W. Newman; Charles W. Prettyman; Walter F. Spath; James C. Blair; Julia R. Brown; Joseph C. Cook, Jr.; Mitchell R. Woodbury; Merill Lynch and Co./Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner and Smith, Inc.; Nissan Motor Co., a Japanese corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-57136. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 4, 2003. Filed August 5, 2003. William S. Lerach, Jan M. Adler, Eric A. Isaacson, Henry Rosen, Tor Gronborg, Joseph D. Daley, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP, Alan Schulman, Blair A. Nicholas, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, LLP, San Diego, CA; Steven J. Toll, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA, for the plaintiffs-appellants. William F. Sullivan, Christopher H. McGrath, Sean T. Prosser, Colleen E. Huschke, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, LLP, San Diego, CA, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.