United States v. Carl Greer MacDonald

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 9677·339 F.3d 1080·2003 WL 21919891·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7270·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16545
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 13, 200302-30245California1,560 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKEOWN, J.

This appeal arises out of Carl Greer MacDonald’s participation in the production of methamphetamine on public lands in Montana. MacDonald pled guilty to a federal conspiracy charge and was sentenced to 30 months imprisonment. The district court enhanced his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.” or the “Guidelines”) due to the unlawful discharge of a hazardous or toxic substance in connection with the violation. MacDonald disputes the applicability of a hazardous substance determination to his circumstances and now appeals that sentence. Because the district court did not clearly err in its factual findings and did not abuse its discretion in applying the enhancement, we affirm.

background

MacDonald was charged in a single-count indictment for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 . He pled guilty and admitted to participating with others in the methamphetamine production on Montana public lands. In the plea agreement, the Government agreed to recommend a base offense level of 12 under the Guidelines, with reductions for MacDonald’s acceptance of responsibility and minor role in the offense. The Presentence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.