Metropolitan Stevedore Company, Petitioner, v. Crescent Wharf And Warehouse Co.

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 9054·339 F.3d 1102·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7263·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16594
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 13, 200301-71505California2,208 words

Opinion

Opinion

339 F.3d 1102 METROPOLITAN STEVEDORE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. CRESCENT WHARF AND WAREHOUSE CO.; Crescent City Marine Ways and Dry Dock Company; Pasha Maritime Services; Homeport Insurance Co.; SAIF Corporation; State Compensation Insurance Fund; William G. Price; Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs; U.S. Department of Labor, Respondents. No. 01-71505. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 3, 2003 — Seattle, Washington. Filed August 13, 2003. 1 Robert E. Babcock, Sherwood, Oregon, for the petitioner. 2 Gary M. Spero (briefed), State Compensation Insurance Fund, Santa Ana, California, for respondents Pasha Maritime Services, Marine Terminals Corporation and State Compensation Insurance Fund. 3 Christopher M. Galichon, Dupree Galichon, plc, San Diego, California, for respondent Crescent Wharf & Warehouse. 4 Norman Cole, SAIF Corporation, Salem, Oregon, for respondents Crescent City Marine Ways & SAIF Corporation. 5 Whitney R. Given, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC, for respondent Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs. 6 Appeal from the Decision and Order of the Benefits Review Board, United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.