United States v. Martha Marie Manion, AKA Mary Peters

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 9136·339 F.3d 1153·2003 WL 21940391·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7298·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16666
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 14, 200301-50562California2,013 words

Opinion

Opinion

Martha Manion was convicted of mail and wire fraud for knowing participation in a fraudulent telemarketing scheme. She claims she was improperly convicted because the government was required to show that she devised the fraudulent scheme, or the court was required to instruct the jury on co-schemer or aiding and abetting liability. We conclude the jury was properly instructed on the standard for liability under the mail and wire fraud statutes, and that there was sufficient evidence to convict Manion for her own fraudulent acts as a knowing participant in the scheme. Since we also reject her other claims of error, we affirm.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Manion was originally indicted on six counts of mail and wire fraud, and aiding and abetting mail and wire fraud, under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 , 1343, and § 2. The indictment alleged that Manion knowingly participated in a fraudulent telemarketing scheme as a salesperson for Pacific West Concepts (“PWC”).

PWC purported to be a legitimate business selling magazines by phone that offered potential customers a chance to enter a sweepstakes contest, with no obligation to purchase magazines. Its real business consisted of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.