Michael John Evanchyk, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Terry Stewart Janet Napolitano, Respondents-Appellants-Cross-Appellees

Good Law
340 F.3d 933·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7554·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17175
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 21, 200301-16744, 02-16942California3,964 words

Opinion

Opinion

Clifton, J.

Under Arizona law, a conviction for first-degree murder can be based on either or both of two theories: premeditated murder (an intentional, planned killing) or felony murder (a killing that results from the intentional commission by defendant of another felony, but which does not necessarily involve an intent to kill). Michael Evanchyk was tried in Arizona state court, together with other defendants, for multiple crimes in connection with events that resulted in a death. He was acquitted by a jury of first-degree murder and of burglary, but was convicted of second-degree murder and of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. He petitioned the district court for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , challenging only the conviction for conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. The district court granted his petition conditionally, subject to the State of Arizona’s ability to retry him on that charge. The district court held that under the instructions given to the jury, Evanchyk could have been convicted for, in effect, conspiracy to commit felony murder, which is not a crime under Arizona law. The State appeals, contending that there was no instructional error and that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.