Michael Ray Lounsbury v. Frank S. Thompson

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 9543·340 F.3d 998·2003 WL 21993253·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7627·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17421
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 200302-35863California2,000 words

Opinion

Opinion

340 F.3d 998 Michael Ray Lounsbury, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank S. Thompson, Respondent-Appellee. No. 02-35863. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 8, 2003 — Portland, Oregon. Filed August 22, 2003. Christopher Schatz, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Portland, Oregon, for the petitioner-appellant. Timothy Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, Oregon, for the respondent-appellee. Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Procter Hug, Jr., and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges. OPINION GOODWIN, Circuit Judge. 1 Michael Lounsbury appeals the denial of his habeas petition, which alleges substantive and procedural errors affecting the determination of his competency to stand trial. BACKGROUND 2 In December 1991, Lounsbury was indicted on 11 counts of aggravated murder for killing Adrienne Thomas in Portland, Oregon. The state trial court held three hearings to determine whether Lounsbury was mentally fit to stand trial. 3 Under Oregon law, if a court "has reason to doubt the defendant's fitness to proceed by reason of incapacity," the court may order an examination by a psychiatrist or a psychologist, and may commit the defendant to a state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.