Transue v. Aesthettech Corp
Opinion
Opinion
341 F.3d 911 Lana Glenell TRANSUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AESTHETECH CORP, Defendant, and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, a Delaware corp; Medical Engineering, a Delaware corp, Surgitek, MEC Subsidiary Corp, a Wisconsin corp individually and as successor in interest to Surgitek Inc dba Surgitak, Mec Subsidiary Corp, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-35733. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 10, 2003 — Seattle, Washington. Filed August 27, 2003. 1 Don Howarth, Los Angeles, California, for plaintiff-appellant and cross-appellee. 2 Suzelle M. Smith, Los Angeles, California, for plaintiff-appellant and cross-appellee. 3 Frederick D. Baker, San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellees and cross-appellants. 4 Michael F. Healy, San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellees and cross-appellants. 5 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV 94-1746L (RSL). 6 Before: DOROTHY W. NELSON and SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Circuit Judges, DEAN D. PREGERSON, * District Judge. OPINION 7 D. PREGERSON, District Judge. 8 Plaintiff-Appellant Lana Transue…