Howard L. Bingham v. City of Manhattan Beach Ernest Klevesahl, Jr. Hodgen Crossett Does, 1-10, Inclusive, and Robert Schreiber, Howard L. Bingham v. City of Manhattan Beach Ernest Klevesahl, Jr., and Robert Schreiber Hodgen Crossett

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 9881·341 F.3d 939·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7831·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 17971
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 28, 200301-56044California9,846 words

Opinion

Opinion

341 F.3d 939 Howard L. BINGHAM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH; Ernest Klevesahl, Jr.; Hodgen Crossett; Does, 1-10, inclusive, Defendants, and Robert Schreiber, Defendant-Appellant. Howard L. Bingham, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of Manhattan Beach; Ernest Klevesahl, Jr., Defendants, and Robert Schreiber; Hodgen Crossett, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-56044. No. 01-56086. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted August 7, 2002 — Pasadena, California. Filed August 28, 2003. David D. Lawrence, Franscell, Strickland, Roberts & Lawrence, Pasadena, California, for the defendant-appellant-cross-appellee. Howard R. Price, Brodey & Price, Beverly Hills, California, for the plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV 00-6882 MMM. Before: Stephen REINHARDT, Stephen S. TROTT, and A. Wallace TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge REINHARDT ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION ORDER 2 The opinion and partially dissenting opinion, filed May 19, 2003, slip…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.