Kyocera Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Dba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc. Lapine Technology Corporation Lapine Holding Co., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Lapine Technology Corporation v. Kyocera Corporation, Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee. v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Dba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 10077·341 F.3d 987·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7934·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18024
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 200301-16528California10,772 words

Opinion

Opinion

341 F.3d 987 KYOCERA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL-BACHE TRADE SERVICES, INC., dba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation; Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc.; Lapine Technology Corporation; Lapine Holding Co., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. LaPine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. LaPine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-defendant-Appellee. v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., dba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation; Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. No. 01-15630. No. 01-16528. No. 01-16394. No. 01-15653. No. 01-16392. No. 01-16182. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted En Banc June 27, 2003. * — San Francisco, California. Filed August 29, 2003. Shirley M. Hufstedler, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Los Angeles, California; James F. McCabe and Angela L. Padilla, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-counter-defendant-appellant. Charles S. Treat and Timothy P. Crudo,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.