Fraser v. Goodale

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 10201·342 F.3d 1032·14 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1377·62 Fed. R. Serv. 303·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8165
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 8, 200301-36018California6,480 words

Opinion

Opinion

342 F.3d 1032 Rebecca Ann FRASER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carol GOODALE; Jeff Erwin; Terri McKinnis; United States Bancorp, a federal insured banking corporation; United States Bank National Assoc., a federal insured banking corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-36018. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 7, 2003 — Portland, Oregon. Filed September 8, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Craig A. Crispin, Crispin & Associates, Portland, Oregon, for the plaintiff-appellant. Janine C. Blatt, Jeffrey J. Druckman, Bruckman & Associates, Portland, Oregon, for the defendants-appellees. Daniel B. Kohrman, AARP Foundation Litigation, Washington, D.C., for the amicus. Carl G. Kiss, Portland, Oregon, for the amicus American Diabetes Association. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Robert E. Jones, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-00543-JO. Before: DONALD P. LAY, * J. CLIFFORD WALLACE, and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge WALLACE; Dissent by Judge TALLMAN OPINION WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 Fraser sued her former employer, United States Bancorp (Bank) under the Americans…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.