Idaho Coalition United for Bears, a Political Committee Lynn Fritchman, an Individual Don Morgan, an Individual Ronald D. Rankin, an Individual Initiative and Referendum Institute, a Not-For-Profit Corporation v. Pete T. Cenarrussa, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Idaho

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 10192·342 F.3d 1073·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8174·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18497
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 8, 200302-35030California3,737 words

Opinion

Opinion

342 F.3d 1073 Idaho Coalition United for Bears, a political committee; Lynn Fritchman, an individual; Don Morgan, an individual; Ronald D. Rankin, an individual; Initiative and Referendum Institute, a not-for-profit corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Pete T. Cenarrussa, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Idaho, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02-35030. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 7, 2003 — Seattle, Washington. Filed September 8, 2003. Brian P. Kane, Deputy Attorney General, and Alan G. Lance, Attorney General, Boise, ID, for the defendant-appellant. Paul Grant, Englewood, CO, for the plaintiff-appellees. Christopher Troupis, Troupis and Summer, Merididan, ID, for the plaintiff-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho; B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-00668-BLW. Before: Stephen Reinhardt, William A. Fletcher, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges. OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. 1 Idaho permits direct legislation through ballot initiatives. In order to appear on the ballot, an initiative must meet several conditions; one is that signatures…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.