United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl Crawford
2003 Daily Journal DAR 10054·343 F.3d 961·2003 WL 22061604·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18112
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 2, 200301-50633California66 words
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.