Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. v. Tektronix Inc.

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 10250·343 F.3d 1000·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8207·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18561
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 9, 200301-56447California8,216 words

Opinion

Opinion

343 F.3d 1000 GLEN HOLLY ENTERTAINMENT INC., a California Corporation dba Digital Images, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEKTRONIX INC., an Oregon Corporation; Avid Technology, Inc, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-56447. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 9, 2002 — Pasadena, California. Filed September 9, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Jeffrey T. Makoff, Makoffs LLP, San Francisco, California, for the Plaintiff-Appellant. Stanley M. Gorinson, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, Washington, DC, for the Defendants-Appellees. James C. Burling, Hale & Dorr, LLP, Boston, Massachusetts, for the Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-02476-SVW. Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Stephen S. Trott and Barry G. Silverman, Circuit Judges. OPINION TROTT, Circuit Judge. 1 Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. ("Digital Images") brought this private antitrust action, with supplemental state law claims, against Tektronix Inc. ("Tektronix") and Avid Technology, Inc. ("Avid"),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.