Drummond v. City of Anaheim

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 10310·343 F.3d 1052·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8231·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 18680
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 10, 200302-55320California6,095 words

Opinion

Opinion

343 F.3d 1052 Brian Thomas DRUMMOND, by and through his Guardian ad Litem Thomas R. DRUMMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ANAHEIM, a California municipal entity, Anaheim Police Department, a California municipal entity, Roger Baker, Christopher Ned, Kristi Valentine, Brian Mcelhaney, Gregory Sawyer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-55320. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 3, 2003 — Pasadena, California. Filed September 10, 2003. Federico C. Sayre and Kent M. Henderson, Law Offices of Federico C. Sayre, Santa Ana, California, for the plaintiff-appellant. Deborah P. Knefel, Deputy City Attorney, Anaheim, California, and William F. Bernard, Orange, California, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Alicemarie H. Stotler, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-00243-AHS. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, HARRY PREGERSON, and STEPHEN REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. OPINION REINHARDT, Circuit Judge. 1 We again confront the interplay of excessive force and qualified immunity in a case in which a mentally disturbed individual suffers serious injuries as a result of an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.