Stephane Moreau v. Air France Joseph P. Bouloux Howard Weisser v. United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 10531·343 F.3d 1179·2003 WL 22119719·8 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1806·84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,484
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 15, 200302-15872California5,897 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hawkins, J.

In this necessarily fact-specific appeal, we must decide whether and in what circumstances contracted service workers should be considered in determining whether an employer is exempt from the requirements of the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and its California counterpart, the California Family Rights Act (“CFRA”). Air France flies an abbreviated schedule (one flight per day) in and out of the San Francisco International Airport (“SFO”), and contracts with outside entities for ramp and towing service, cargo and baggage handling, and food preparation. If Air France is considered the “joint employer” of the workers performing these services, it is subject to FMLA-CFRA requirements. From an adverse summary judgment concluding Air France was not a joint employer of these workers, Stephane Moreau (“Moreau”) appeals.

Air France employed Moreau as its Assistant Station Manager at SFO. In March of 1998, Moreau requested a twelve-week leave of absence to assist his ill father in France, asserting entitlement under the FMLA and CFRA. The request was addressed to Moreau’s immediate supervisor, defendant Joseph Bouloux; a copy was forwarded to defendant Howard Weisser, Air…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.