United States v. Raymond Twine

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 10760·344 F.3d 987·2003 WL 22155549·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8562·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 19429
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 200303-10393California369 words

Opinion

Opinion

Defendant-Appellant Raymond Twine (“Twine”), charged with felon in possession of a firearm pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1), appeals the district court’s pretrial detention order holding him without bail.

The district court held that the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142 , authorizes Twine’s pretrial detention without bail on the sole basis of a finding of dangerousness to the community. The district court alternatively held that felon in possession of a firearm is a crime of violence, and that this finding triggers the Act’s express authority to hold Twine without bail pending trial after a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (f). The district court also affirmed the magistrate judge’s finding of dangerousness to the community.

We are not persuaded that the Bail Reform Act authorizes pretrial detention without bail based solely on a finding of dangerousness. This interpretation of the Act would render meaningless 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (f)(1) and (2). Our interpretation is in accord with our sister circuits who have ruled on this issue. See United States v. Byrd, 969 F.2d 106 (6th Cir.1992); United States v. Ploof, 851 F.2d 7 (1st Cir.1988); United States v. Himler, 797…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.