Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 11124·345 F.3d 742·84 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,504·92 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1121·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8755
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 30, 200301-55321California14,929 words

Opinion

Opinion

345 F.3d 742 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Defendant-Appellant. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Defendant-Appellee. No. 00-57222. No. 01-55321. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 27, 2003 — San Francisco, California. Filed September 30, 2003. Charles A. Bird, Kelly Capen Douglas, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP, San Diego, California, for the defendant-appellant-appellee. Dori Bernstein, EEOC, Washington, DC, for the plaintiff-appellee-appellant. Cliff Palefsky, McGuinn, Hillsman & Palefsky, San Francisco, California, for intervenor Donald Lagatree, and for amici curiae National Employment Lawyers Association and American Association of Retired Persons. Robert F. Walker, Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker LLP, Los Angeles, California, for amicus curiae The Employers Group. David S. Schwartz, University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, Wisconsin, and John M. True, Leonard Carder, LLP, Oakland, California, for amici curiae George Miller, Barney Frank, Dennis J. Kucinich, John…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.