Freund v. Nycomed Amersham

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 11561·347 F.3d 752·20 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1874·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9191·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 21233
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 200301-56491California10,502 words

Opinion

Opinion

347 F.3d 752 Jeffrey R. FREUND, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. NYCOMED AMERSHAM, a business entity, form unknown; Amersham Holdings, Inc.; Nycomed Amersham Imaging, a division of Nycomed Amersham; Amersham/Medi-Physics, Inc., a division of Nycomed Amersham, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. No. 01-56491. No. 01-56494. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted November 5, 2002 — Pasadena, California. Filed October 21, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Diane Westwood Wilson and Andrew J. Harakas, Condon & Forsyth LLP, New York, NY, for the defendants-appellants-cross-appellees. John S. Adler, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-02202-IEG(LSP). Before: William C. CANBY, Jr., Ronald M. GOULD, and Marsha S. BERZON, Circuit Judges. 1 Opinion by Judge CANBY; Dissent by Judge GOULD. ORDER 2 Judges Canby and Berzon have voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing in part and to deny it in part. Judge Gould has voted to grant the petition. The petition of Nycomed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.