Doe v. Lebbos

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 12052·348 F.3d 820·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9577·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 22632
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 200302-16326California7,285 words

Opinion

Opinion

348 F.3d 820 George DOE, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem; Lacey Doe, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Betsey Warren LEBBOS; Lisvet Carrillo-Herrera; Aida Madeline Lebbos; Aida Lebbos Trust; County of Santa Clara; Santa Clara County Department of Social Services; Santa Clara County Child Protective Services, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-16326. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 11, 2003. * — San Francisco, California. Filed November 4, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Robert R. Powell, Law Offices of Robert R. Powell, San Jose, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Ann Miller Ravel, County Counsel, Winifred Botha, Lead Deputy County Counsel, Office of the County Counsel, San Jose, California, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-21274-RMW/PVT. Before: Pamela Ann Rymer, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Paez; Dissent by Judge Kleinfeld. OPINION PAEZ, Circuit Judge: 1 George and Lacey Doe (the "Does") appeal from the district court's summary judgment on their 42…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.