Doe v. Lebbos
Opinion
Opinion
348 F.3d 820 George DOE, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem; Lacey Doe, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Betsey Warren LEBBOS; Lisvet Carrillo-Herrera; Aida Madeline Lebbos; Aida Lebbos Trust; County of Santa Clara; Santa Clara County Department of Social Services; Santa Clara County Child Protective Services, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-16326. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 11, 2003. * — San Francisco, California. Filed November 4, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Robert R. Powell, Law Offices of Robert R. Powell, San Jose, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Ann Miller Ravel, County Counsel, Winifred Botha, Lead Deputy County Counsel, Office of the County Counsel, San Jose, California, for the defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-21274-RMW/PVT. Before: Pamela Ann Rymer, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Paez; Dissent by Judge Kleinfeld. OPINION PAEZ, Circuit Judge: 1 George and Lacey Doe (the "Does") appeal from the district court's summary judgment on their 42…