Gerardo Aguilera-Ruiz v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General

Good Law
2003 Daily Journal DAR 12050·348 F.3d 835·2003 WL 22479999·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9575·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 22636
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 200302-57212California1,789 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rymer, J.

Gerardo Aguilera-Ruiz is a native and citizen of Mexico and has been a legal permanent resident of the United States since 1981. After being ordered deported, and while an appeal was pending before the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), Aguilera-Ruiz went to Tijuana, Mexico to buy tequila, candies, and piñatas for a party. The BIA deemed his appeal withdrawn pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.4 , which provides:

Aguilera-Ruiz sought habeas relief in federal district court to reinstate his appeal so that his claim for discretionary relief under former Immigration and Naturalization Act (INA) § 212(c) could be considered. The petition was denied. He now argues that the withdrawal-of-appeal regulation is without statutory basis, conflicts with 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(2) and 8 C.F.R. § 1.1 (p), and runs counter to Congressional intent to preserve the status of a legal permanent resident who makes a “brief, casual, and innocent” departure. We disagree, and affirm.

I

Aguilera-Ruiz was placed in deportation proceedings by the Immigration and Naturalization Service on August 25, 1995, following his conviction for possession of a controlled substance while armed with a firearm in violation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.