United States for an Order Authorizing the Roving Interception of Oral Communications v. United States
Opinion
Opinion
349 F.3d 1132 In the Matter of the Application of the UNITED STATES FOR AN ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ROVING INTERCEPTION OF ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, The Company, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 02-15635. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 2, 2002. Filed November 18, 2003. Bennee B. Jones, Andrews & Kurth LLP, Dallas, Texas, for the appellant. Eric Johnson, Senior Litigation Counsel, and Kathleen Bliss, Assistant United States Attorney, Organized Crime Strike Force, Office of the United States Attorney, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-01-01495-LDG. Before: John T. NOONAN, Marsha S. BERZON, and Richard C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge BERZON. Dissent by Judge TALLMAN. OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: 1 Giving new meaning to the automotive advertising slogans "The Ultimate Driving Machine" 1 and "We've Got You Covered," 2 some luxury cars are now equipped with telecommunication devices that provide a set of innovative services to car owners. These on-board systems assist drivers in…