Johnson v. Reilly

Good Law
349 F.3d 1149·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9901·2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23441
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 200301-36033California3,086 words

Opinion

Opinion

349 F.3d 1149 Martin Allen JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward F. REILLY, Jr., Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission; John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States; Jim Spinden, Sheriff, Washington County, Oregon; Dan Noelle, Sheriff, Multnomah County, Oregon; Pat Detloff, Sheriff, Clackamas County, Oregon, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-36033. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 7, 2003. Filed November 18, 2003. Christine Stebbins Dahl, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Portland, OR, for the Petitioner-Appellant. Kenneth C. Bauman, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Portland, OR, for the Respondents-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-01-00922-HO. Before LAY, * WALLACE, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges. WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 Johnson appeals from the decision of the district court denying his petitions for a writ of mandamus to the United States Parole Commission (Commission), for habeas corpus, and for declaratory relief. The district court assumed jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 . 28 U.S.C. § 1291 provides us…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.